Search
-
Recent Content
Editors
- Nicholas Mattone – Editor-in-Chief
- Suzanne Hom, Hannah Marose – Managing Editors
Faculty Advisors
- Rosa Castello
- Nicholas Mattone – Editor-in-Chief
Commercial Division Online Law Report
New York County Supreme Court Commercial Division
Hon. Andrew Borrok
Hon. Joel M. Cohen
Hon. Marcy Friedman
Hon. Andrea Masley
Hon. Barry Ostrager
Hon. Saliann Scarpulla
Hon. O. Peter Sherwood
Hon. Jennifer G. Schecter-
New York County Supreme Court Commercial Division
Hon. Andrew Borrok
Hon. Joel M. Cohen
Hon. Marcy Friedman
Hon. Andrea Masley
Hon. Barry Ostrager
Hon. Saliann Scarpulla
Hon. O. Peter Sherwood
Hon. Jennifer G. SchecterArchives
- April 2024
- January 2024
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- February 2021
- June 2020
- March 2019
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
Top Clicks
- None
Monthly Archives: February 2015
Lau v. Lazar, Index No. 651648/2013, 10/14/2014 (Kornreich, J.).
By Christine Kummer | Staff Writer Contract; individual liability; veil piercing; NY LLC §609-10; unjust enrichment. Individual defendant, an accountant and owner of corporate defendants negotiated a letter of intent with individual plaintiff, a doctor and owner of corporate plaintiffs … Continue reading
Posted in Case Summary
Tagged Contract, Individual Liability, NY LLC §609-10, Piercing the Veil, Unjust Enrichment
Leave a comment
Ambac Assurance Corporation v. EMC Mortgage LLC, Index No. 12665 651013/12 (Kapnick, J.).
By Evan Jaffe | Staff Writer Contract; breach; standing. Plaintiff brought suit seeking to recover losses for breaches of multiple sections of interconnected contracts involving residential mortgage-backed-securities (“RMBS”). Plaintiff alleged Defendant’s fraud and misrepresentations caused Plaintiff to pay over $300 … Continue reading